SFD® Technology
How SFD® Fits Alongside Conventional Geophysical Methods
Every exploration method provides unique information about the subsurface. Understanding the strengths and limitations of each is key to designing an effective exploration programme. Here’s how SFD® fits alongside the methods your G&G team already uses.
Multiple Methods. One Goal.
The goal of oil and gas exploration is to find hydrocarbon accumulations in commercial quantities. Petroleum geoscientists seek information from multiple sources to evaluate the elements and processes required for a successful petroleum system:
Elements
Source rock, migration route, reservoir, trap, seal
Processes
Generation, migration, accumulation, preservation
SFD® surveys can evaluate three of these elements — trap configuration, reservoir quality, and seal integrity — providing information on areas conducive to fluid entrapment in the sedimentary column. The use of multiple, complementary methods provides additional confidence in subsurface geological models and reduces exploration risk.
SFD® and Conventional Methods
SFD®
Cost relative to seismic
Typically a fraction of seismic cost
Measures
Stress-field perturbations
Scale
Prospect scale
Onshore
Yes
Offshore
Yes
SFD® relationship
Adds fluid-entrapment information to the exploration programme
2D and 3D Seismic
Cost relative to seismic
Baseline (1x)
Measures
Acoustic impedance
Scale
Structure + stratigraphy
Onshore
Yes
Offshore
Yes
Reflection seismology uses a controlled source to emit a signal into the earth and an array of receivers to capture reflections from subsurface strata. Processing and modelling produces seismic images and rock property estimates. The industry’s primary subsurface imaging tool — high resolution but high cost and long lead times. SFD® acts as a first-pass reconnaissance tool to focus seismic acquisition on the highest-potential areas, reducing the total seismic programme cost.
SFD® relationship
SFD® focuses where to acquire seismic
Aeromagnetics
Cost relative to seismic
Low
Measures
Magnetic susceptibility
Scale
Basin architecture
Onshore
Yes
Offshore
Yes
Aeromagnetic and Aerogravity
Magnetic and gravity data acquired from an aircraft, typically used in early-stage exploration to map basin architecture. Underlying crystalline basement rocks have higher densities than overlying sedimentary cover; processing and inversion of gravity data determines "depth to basement." Helps develop hydrocarbon source/maturity models and determine where to focus exploration. SFD® operates at a different scale — resolving prospect-level anomalies rather than basin-scale structure.
Magnetometers
Measure magnetic susceptibility of materials to aid in mapping basin architecture. Magnetic data can also map fluid conduits due to associated mineralisation effects. Complementary to SFD® — magnetics maps structure, SFD® maps fluid entrapment potential.
SFD® relationship
Complementary — different scale
Aerogravity
Cost relative to seismic
Low
Measures
Density (bulk)
Scale
Basin architecture
Onshore
Yes
Offshore
Yes
Gravimeters
Use accelerometers (a test mass on a spring) to measure variations in subsurface density based on gravitational acceleration between measurement points. Conventional gravimetry maps large-scale density contrasts across basin and sub-basin scales. SFD® contributes prospect-scale stress-field data that complements the broader structural picture provided by conventional gravimetry.
SFD® relationship
Complementary — different scale and physics
Full Tensor Gravity Gradiometry (FTG)
Cost relative to seismic
Medium
Measures
Density gradients
Scale
Prospect scale
Onshore
Yes
Offshore
Yes
Uses multiple pairs of accelerometers to measure the derivative of the gravity field in all three principal axes. Measuring derivatives gives higher resolution gravity data but is inherently more sensitive to noise. Processing and inversion can locate prospect-level gravity anomalies. SFD® provides complementary information — while FTG resolves density anomalies, SFD® responds to stress field perturbations associated with fluid entrapment.
SFD® relationship
Complementary — different physics
Controlled Source Electromagnetic (CSEM)
Cost relative to seismic
Medium–High
Measures
Resistivity
Scale
Prospect scale
Onshore
No (marine)
Offshore
Yes
Marine surveying method that maps resistive bodies in the subsurface by transmitting a low-frequency electromagnetic signal. EM energy is quickly attenuated in conductive sediments while resistive layers (potentially containing hydrocarbons) show less attenuation. Processing produces subsurface resistivity maps. SFD® provides a different physical measurement (stress-field perturbations rather than resistivity) and operates both onshore and offshore, adding another line of evidence to the exploration programme.
SFD® relationship
Complementary — different physics; SFD® also operates onshore
Magnetotellurics (MT)
Cost relative to seismic
Medium
Measures
Resistivity
Scale
Prospect scale
Onshore
Yes
Offshore
Yes
Electromagnetic method imaging the subsurface by measuring natural variations of electrical and magnetic fields at the earth’s surface. Mainly used as a complement to seismic — seismic images structure but cannot detect resistivity changes associated with hydrocarbons. MT detects resistivity variations that can differentiate hydrocarbon-bearing formations. SFD® adds a third independent dataset alongside seismic and MT.
SFD® relationship
Complementary — different physics