SFD® Technology

How SFD® Fits Alongside Conventional Geophysical Methods

Every exploration method provides unique information about the subsurface. Understanding the strengths and limitations of each is key to designing an effective exploration programme. Here’s how SFD® fits alongside the methods your G&G team already uses.

Multiple Methods. One Goal.

The goal of oil and gas exploration is to find hydrocarbon accumulations in commercial quantities. Petroleum geoscientists seek information from multiple sources to evaluate the elements and processes required for a successful petroleum system:

Elements

Source rock, migration route, reservoir, trap, seal

Processes

Generation, migration, accumulation, preservation

SFD® surveys can evaluate three of these elements — trap configuration, reservoir quality, and seal integrity — providing information on areas conducive to fluid entrapment in the sedimentary column. The use of multiple, complementary methods provides additional confidence in subsurface geological models and reduces exploration risk.

SFD® and Conventional Methods

SFD®

Cost relative to seismic

Typically a fraction of seismic cost

Measures

Stress-field perturbations

Scale

Prospect scale

Onshore

Yes

Offshore

Yes

SFD® relationship

Adds fluid-entrapment information to the exploration programme

2D and 3D Seismic

Cost relative to seismic

Baseline (1x)

Measures

Acoustic impedance

Scale

Structure + stratigraphy

Onshore

Yes

Offshore

Yes

Reflection seismology uses a controlled source to emit a signal into the earth and an array of receivers to capture reflections from subsurface strata. Processing and modelling produces seismic images and rock property estimates. The industry’s primary subsurface imaging tool — high resolution but high cost and long lead times. SFD® acts as a first-pass reconnaissance tool to focus seismic acquisition on the highest-potential areas, reducing the total seismic programme cost.

SFD® relationship

SFD® focuses where to acquire seismic

Aeromagnetics

Cost relative to seismic

Low

Measures

Magnetic susceptibility

Scale

Basin architecture

Onshore

Yes

Offshore

Yes

Aeromagnetic and Aerogravity

Magnetic and gravity data acquired from an aircraft, typically used in early-stage exploration to map basin architecture. Underlying crystalline basement rocks have higher densities than overlying sedimentary cover; processing and inversion of gravity data determines "depth to basement." Helps develop hydrocarbon source/maturity models and determine where to focus exploration. SFD® operates at a different scale — resolving prospect-level anomalies rather than basin-scale structure.

Magnetometers

Measure magnetic susceptibility of materials to aid in mapping basin architecture. Magnetic data can also map fluid conduits due to associated mineralisation effects. Complementary to SFD® — magnetics maps structure, SFD® maps fluid entrapment potential.

SFD® relationship

Complementary — different scale

Aerogravity

Cost relative to seismic

Low

Measures

Density (bulk)

Scale

Basin architecture

Onshore

Yes

Offshore

Yes

Gravimeters

Use accelerometers (a test mass on a spring) to measure variations in subsurface density based on gravitational acceleration between measurement points. Conventional gravimetry maps large-scale density contrasts across basin and sub-basin scales. SFD® contributes prospect-scale stress-field data that complements the broader structural picture provided by conventional gravimetry.

SFD® relationship

Complementary — different scale and physics

Full Tensor Gravity Gradiometry (FTG)

Cost relative to seismic

Medium

Measures

Density gradients

Scale

Prospect scale

Onshore

Yes

Offshore

Yes

Uses multiple pairs of accelerometers to measure the derivative of the gravity field in all three principal axes. Measuring derivatives gives higher resolution gravity data but is inherently more sensitive to noise. Processing and inversion can locate prospect-level gravity anomalies. SFD® provides complementary information — while FTG resolves density anomalies, SFD® responds to stress field perturbations associated with fluid entrapment.

SFD® relationship

Complementary — different physics

Controlled Source Electromagnetic (CSEM)

Cost relative to seismic

Medium–High

Measures

Resistivity

Scale

Prospect scale

Onshore

No (marine)

Offshore

Yes

Marine surveying method that maps resistive bodies in the subsurface by transmitting a low-frequency electromagnetic signal. EM energy is quickly attenuated in conductive sediments while resistive layers (potentially containing hydrocarbons) show less attenuation. Processing produces subsurface resistivity maps. SFD® provides a different physical measurement (stress-field perturbations rather than resistivity) and operates both onshore and offshore, adding another line of evidence to the exploration programme.

SFD® relationship

Complementary — different physics; SFD® also operates onshore

Magnetotellurics (MT)

Cost relative to seismic

Medium

Measures

Resistivity

Scale

Prospect scale

Onshore

Yes

Offshore

Yes

Electromagnetic method imaging the subsurface by measuring natural variations of electrical and magnetic fields at the earth’s surface. Mainly used as a complement to seismic — seismic images structure but cannot detect resistivity changes associated with hydrocarbons. MT detects resistivity variations that can differentiate hydrocarbon-bearing formations. SFD® adds a third independent dataset alongside seismic and MT.

SFD® relationship

Complementary — different physics

Newsletter Signup

Get SFD® Case Studies & Technical Updates

Tell Us About Your Exploration Program

Investor Relations

Contact Investor Relations